Cinemascapes

From screen to street. A mobile experience that turns the films you love into places you can explore.

My focus
Experience design, maps + visual system
Format
Mobile web app, React + Mapbox
Project stage
Product concept

The opportunity

The inspiration is cinematic. The planning rarely is.

A film gives a place meaning before we ever arrive. But getting there can mean piecing together a moodboard, a location list and a map. The opportunity is in the spaces between the landmarks: carrying a scene’s context, colour and atmosphere through the journey itself.

A La La Land frame held up against the real pier at dusk.A La La Land frame held up against the real overlook at Cathy’s Corner.An Amélie frame held up inside the real Café des Deux Moulins.
A familiar frame changes how we see an ordinary place. Imagery from the project moodboard.

The evidence

People want this. The drop happens when the trip becomes work.

One Expedia statistic is a claim, so I checked it against independent surveys, search behaviour, destination economics and what visitors say once they arrive. Inspiration sits between 60 and 80 percent. Conversion into a booked trip sits near 20. The distance between those two numbers is where a planning product lives.

Different companies, countries, samples and questions. Expedia, Unpack ’26; American Express, 2023; Expedia, Unpack ’27. All secondary research.

“Set-jetting” is the industry’s name for the behaviour and barely registers as a search. People type the film’s title and the words filming locations, which is a planning query, not a dreaming one.

Worldwide Google searches for “filming locations”, yearly average of the monthly index. The 2025 average is nine times 2004 and 30% above 2024. Pulled 4 November 2026.

What exists

Everyone sells the destination. No one designs the trail.

The database layer exists. The booking layer exists. The guided-coach layer exists. The leading app’s reviewers ask for a place to keep the spots they starred so they can follow them on the trip. The most requested feature is the product.

Checked November 2026.

Route analysis

A film is not one kind of trail.

Every guide publishes a list of addresses in plot order, which is a route for neither of these films. Across every documented location, La La Land is a day of driving across a county and Amélie is mostly a walk, so I order stops by the street, not the script.

La La LandLos Angeles

3 of 12 legs walkable

Warner Bros. Studios to The Smoke House220 m, walkable

146 km by road10 km

AmélieParis

10 of 11 legs walkable

Lamarck–Caulaincourt to Rue Saint-Vincent460 m, walkable

12 km by road1 km

Every documented location, in a hand-ordered day. Street routes from OpenStreetMap data. A leg counts as walkable at 2 km or less on foot.

The trails in the app take a cut of each: six stops and 74 km by road in Los Angeles, five stops and 4.6 km in Paris. The plan shows the commitment before you start, and it times the whole day backwards from the light the key scene needs.

The Twilight in Griffith plan: 6 stops, 74 km by road, 4 hours 5 minutes, with a start time worked back from sunset at Cathy’s Corner.
A drive, timed to reach Cathy’s Corner before sunset.
The Amélie’s Montmartre plan: 5 stops, 4.6 km, about 2 hours, starting at 09:30.
A morning walk down the Butte and across to the canal.

Theory of the trail

A director puts a feeling on film. The trail puts it back on the street.

Set-jetting is usually treated as finding an address. The feeling people travel for was manufactured by specific decisions about colour, light, frame, movement, dressing and sound. Most can be recovered in the real place, but only if the trail knows which ones they were.

Palette and grade

The violet sky is a colour grade, not the weather.

The city is re-scored in the film’s palette so the grade travels with you.

Light and hour

Magic hour. At noon the same view is haze.

Each stop carries a best hour, and the plan times the day backwards from the key scene’s light.

Frame and vantage

Camera height, lens and standing point decide the picture.

The viewfinder aligns the frame and gives an approximate heading.

Movement

The dance travels along the road. Scenes have a direction.

Where it is possible, legs follow the characters’ direction of travel, and the stop says so.

Production design

The bench and the lamp were set dressing. There is no bench.

A reality check on each stop flags what was set dressing.

Score

A song owns the scene and tells you how to feel in it.

A compact soundtrack control plays a preview of the score on the approach.

Cathy’s Corner, Mount Hollywood Drive. In the frame: magic hour, a violet grade, a bench and a lamp. On the road at noon: haze, no bench, no lamp. Everything between the two is the trail’s job.

The closer model is a theme park, not a map app. A ride is a sequence of scenes with the transitions designed as carefully as the scenes. A trail through a real city needs the same seven beats, with the city standing in for the set.

Finding a way in

Enter through the film, land in the city.

People search a film’s title, so the film is the door. A map of pins by city is how every database already fails. Discovery leads with a recognisable scene, the map is the second door, and saved trails give a passing interest somewhere to live until the visitor is ready.

The home screen leading with La La Land’s Twilight in Griffith trail.
Through a film
Through a place
The Twilight in Griffith trail plan.
The same trail

Cinematic cartography

What if the map felt like the film?

The city provides the structure; the film provides the emotional register. I grade by role, not resemblance: the film’s dominant colour goes to the map’s largest surface, its light source to water and parks, and its protagonist’s colour to the route and the one action.

The colour script

A film is not one palette. Neither should the trail be.

Three colours is the right first move and the wrong last one. Films are planned colour by scene, as in Pixar’s colour scripts, and La La Land let its costumes desaturate as the couple matured. So each stop inherits its scene’s grade, and the map dissolves to it as the trail moves on. Only the ground and the light move; the route’s accent holds, because atmosphere moves and wayfinding doesn’t.

The palette can carry emotion, but directions still need to be unmistakable. A daylight guard keeps the hue and lifts the roads.

La La Land saturates towards the epilogue.
Amélie keeps one grade and moves its temperature.
The daylight guard, on and off.

Scene palettes are read from stills by eye and blended into each film’s base map.

The connected experience

Different worlds. A familiar way through.

The app connects discovery, planning, navigation and scene context. I kept the map in the film’s palette instead of handing off to Google Maps between stops, which would be cheaper and break the spell. Soundtrack, prompt and stop card hold their positions, so the world changes inside a fixed frame. Each leg has its own travel mode, and context expands when you want it, including what was dressed or isn’t there at all.

A walked leg in Montmartre.
A driven leg to Griffith Park, sped up.
“There is no bench.”

The moment of arrival

You found the place. Now find the frame.

Expectation is set on screen, and disappointment happens on the pavement. A photo gallery would show the scene but not where to stand, so an adjustable overlay invites the visitor to line up the film with the place in front of them. Take the shot and it goes in a reel, and the trail ends by asking where the feeling held and where it broke.

Align the frame, take the shot, open the context.
The reel, and did the feeling hold?

A reference photo stands in for the street here. Film stills are for concept use only, and “Official trail” and bookings are placeholders: no studio partnership or partner is claimed.

The service

A trail is a day out, not a map.

The screens are the visible half. A trail is a day: something happens before you leave, something on the street and something after. Most of what makes it work sits behind it: sourced stops, scouted standpoints, the right to use a still, and a city’s rules.

Before the plan, the trail asks three things it can’t guess. How you’re getting around. Whether you’ve seen the film, so the last act holds its scenes back. And whether you have headphones, because a soundtrack on a phone speaker is noise on someone else’s street. The first answer changes the whole day.

The four legs of the Rockstar trail as the app routes them, without time at the stops. The 900 metres between the colleges stays a walk. Mapbox estimates, 9 November 2026.

By metro, more than half the travel time is walking, most of it between the station and the stop. By car the day looks shortest and gives some of it back to Delhi’s traffic. So the mode is the visitor’s choice, not the trail’s. Each answer reroutes every leg, and the start moves so the day still reaches the dargah before sunset, when the qawwali begins.

Access and residents

Some stops you can’t enter. Some you shouldn’t.

Every trail has stops that are closed, timed, governed by rules or not there at all. So access decides what a stop becomes, not only whether it’s shown. Five rungs cover every stop on the three trails.

The other limit is the people who live there. Screen tourism has a record of turning streets into sets, and places push back.

Press reports, 2017 to 2025.

So the trail keeps rules of its own. Standpoints stand on public ground, and a private home is never a stop. Residential streets get quiet hours, the track plays through headphones, and start times are staggered when many people plan the same trail for the same day. A city or a site can pause a stop, and the trail reroutes around it.

The business case

Film tourism already has the money.

Cinemascapes is a product concept, and the financial case is straightforward. Inbound visitors spent £892.6m on film-related screen tourism in the UK in 2019, and travel platforms sell where to stay but not what you do once you’re there.

None of what a trail needs belongs to it. Each party gives something and expects something back, and residents are the one party with nothing to gain unless the trail spends locally. That’s why access and quiet hours live in the product, not on a policy page.

Each measure has a definition, the unit it’s read at, and the decision it feeds. The test rounds read the first five by hand; partner footfall waits for partners.

Past two trails

Trail fifty is made by people who live there.

Two trails were made by hand, and so was the third. Laid out step by step, the split is clear: the app can already route and time a trail, and could suggest a palette. Sourcing scenes, checking access and finding standpoints take a person, on foot, in that city.

So trail fifty won’t come from a better algorithm. It would come from people in each city working to one method: film students, location scouts and the film offices that already keep the lists, with every stop marked by how many sources agree, and the first walk counted as the last step.

The test trail

A trail I can walk changes what the trail has to know.

Los Angeles and Paris came with fan-made maps. A test needs a trail I can walk again and again, so I built a third in Delhi, where I live: Imtiaz Ali’s Rockstar, from the two colleges on Sudhir Bose Marg to Nizamuddin Dargah, five stops in a day by metro. Preparing it surfaced what the first two had hidden.

From IMDb’s location notes, Wikipedia’s production notes and film press. Sadda Haq was also shot in Mumbai and Dharamshala.

Hindi films have no fan trails, so the research becomes part of the product: three of the five stops are tied to their scenes by more than one source, and the app says so when a stop isn’t verified. Both colleges turn strangers away, so they became stops you take from the gate: the track plays and a card tells you what happens behind the wall.

The testing is slow by nature and runs in rounds. First I walk it alone, more than once, on Thursdays so the day ends at the evening qawwali. Later rounds bring five to ten people who know the film, with me walking behind them and not helping. Each round feeds changes back into the app before the next one. What’s fixed now is what each round records: at each stop, the minutes from arriving to finding where to stand, whether the gate stops still carry the scene, whether the feeling held, and anywhere someone switched to Google Maps.

Where it fell short

The Delhi trail exposed what the first two hid.

Building a trail I can walk turned up problems two trails abroad never could. Some are fixed. The rest wait for the street.

Metro as a drive

Delhi’s metro legs were routed as car journeys. Now a leg walks to the station, rides and walks on. Fixed.

Two gates, 930 metres apart

Hindu College and St. Stephen’s face each other across one road. The router sends you 930 metres round. Open.

A first stop that never arrives

The trail starts at stop one, so arrival never fires there, and its track never cues. Open.

Colours by eye

Scene palettes are read from stills by eye, and Delhi’s map colours are still a draft. Open.

Where it stands

The feeling is there. The journey needs to earn it.

None of this has been tried on a real street yet. The clearest lesson is that atmosphere and utility have to develop together: a beautiful line between two places is only the beginning of a usable trail.

Everything here now waits on the walk: the measures, the standpoints, the gate stops, the stretch from the station and the questions before the plan. The Delhi trail will be walked in rounds, and this page will change with each one. The film ends. The city keeps going.